lexuscva
Member
Các bác giúp em cái, em mới tập viết h34r: h34r:
Responsibility for crimes lives with society not individuals.
What extend do you agree? Give reasons.
======================
Society has responsibility for crimes, I completely agree with this statement.Moreover, I firmly believe that criminals are absolutely influenced by their environment regardless of some people's supposition that crimes belong to individuals ‘s responsibility.In this essay, I will outline distinctly my view point.
Undoubtedly, It is impossible to refute society’s role in creating crimes.The way our parents educated us, the environment we live in, influenced directly the way we behave.Let me illustrate, a child who is born in a broken-family, growing up without education of parents would have a tendency to misbehave and lead to crimes.Another example is an individual who lives in poverty. If he would not be able to afford food and basic demands of living, it is easy to understand that they have to steal to survive.Therefore, the more a government looks after its citizen’s lives, the less criminals occur.Obviously, the crucial role of society with criminals is undeniable.
However, some people still argue that individuals partly contribute to creation of a crime.Firmly, they proposed an example of a person who is lazy, doesn’t want to work and prefer to do illegal activities because of its huge profits without working hard. In addition, they gave another example of an individual who envisages a difficult situation to decide whether to commit a crime or not, eventually they conclude that the decision of the individual in this case depends absolutely on him, not on an objective factor. I am doubtful whether they really understand the key point in this situation.The key of these situations is that environmental factors do not influence directly at the moment they make a decision but gradually their thought and their behaviour.When they face a difficult situation, their thought which has been affected gradually by society would show them how to act. By these words, i mean an individual with a good education and living in ethical community would immediately choose not to commit a crime. Differently, a person without education would become criminal in the same situation.
In the final analysis, once more time, I want to emphasise that society is crucial factor in crimes. Personally, I suppose that there is no evidence to prove individuals ‘s responsibility in this issue. Society influences directly and indirectly creation of criminals.
Responsibility for crimes lives with society not individuals.
What extend do you agree? Give reasons.
======================
Society has responsibility for crimes, I completely agree with this statement.Moreover, I firmly believe that criminals are absolutely influenced by their environment regardless of some people's supposition that crimes belong to individuals ‘s responsibility.In this essay, I will outline distinctly my view point.
Undoubtedly, It is impossible to refute society’s role in creating crimes.The way our parents educated us, the environment we live in, influenced directly the way we behave.Let me illustrate, a child who is born in a broken-family, growing up without education of parents would have a tendency to misbehave and lead to crimes.Another example is an individual who lives in poverty. If he would not be able to afford food and basic demands of living, it is easy to understand that they have to steal to survive.Therefore, the more a government looks after its citizen’s lives, the less criminals occur.Obviously, the crucial role of society with criminals is undeniable.
However, some people still argue that individuals partly contribute to creation of a crime.Firmly, they proposed an example of a person who is lazy, doesn’t want to work and prefer to do illegal activities because of its huge profits without working hard. In addition, they gave another example of an individual who envisages a difficult situation to decide whether to commit a crime or not, eventually they conclude that the decision of the individual in this case depends absolutely on him, not on an objective factor. I am doubtful whether they really understand the key point in this situation.The key of these situations is that environmental factors do not influence directly at the moment they make a decision but gradually their thought and their behaviour.When they face a difficult situation, their thought which has been affected gradually by society would show them how to act. By these words, i mean an individual with a good education and living in ethical community would immediately choose not to commit a crime. Differently, a person without education would become criminal in the same situation.
In the final analysis, once more time, I want to emphasise that society is crucial factor in crimes. Personally, I suppose that there is no evidence to prove individuals ‘s responsibility in this issue. Society influences directly and indirectly creation of criminals.